Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to health.


The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could result in various potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.

While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances.  how to reduce wifi radiation at home  is the biggest organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Additionally,  how to block magnetic field  and FCC are limiting their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.